J. N. Darby
HOW TO GET PEACE*
How can
I get peace with God?
He has "made peace by the blood of the cross." I
do not deny that; I believe it; but I have
not peace; and how can I have that peace myself? "Being
justified by faith, we have peace with
God." Well, I
know it is so
written, but I have not peace; that I know: I wish I had, and I
sometimes think
I do not believe at all. I see you happy; and how is that happiness of
soul to
be had? You
do not then think it presumptuous to be at peace
with God in the assurance of His favour, and thus of our own salvation? I think
it would be in me;
but I see it in scripture, and therefore it must be right; and I see a
few who
enjoy the divine favour, in whom one sees it is real. But I do not know
how to
get this. It leaves me distressed if I think of it, though I get on
from day to
day as other Christians do; but when this question is raised, I know I
am not
at peace, nor assured of divine favour resting upon me, as I see you
and others
enjoying it. And it is a serious thing, because if "being justified by
faith, we have peace with God," as you say, and as I know scripture
says,
I have not peace with God; and how, then, can I be justified? You
have not the true knowledge of justification by
faith. I do not say you are not justified in God's sight, but your
conscience
has not possession of it. The Reformers, all of them, went further than
I do.
They all held that if a man had not the assurance of his own salvation
he was
not justified at all. Now, whoever believes in the Son of God is, in
God's
sight, justified from all things. But till he sees this as taught of
God, till
he apprehends the value of Christ's work, he has no consciousness of it
in his
own soul, and, of course, if in earnest, as you are, he has not peace;
nor is
his peace solidly established till he knows he is in Christ, as well as
that
Christ died for him; and the Christian's getting on, as you say, day by
day, is
a false and hollow thing, which must some time or other be broken up.
It is
that which often causes distress on death-beds. And the character of
Christian
activity is sadly deteriorated and made a business of, a kind of means
of
getting happy, not work in the power of the Spirit, by a soul at peace. If
a person is really serious, and walks before God,
he cannot rest in spirit till he be at peace with Him, and the deeper
all these
exercises are the better. But He has made peace by the blood of the
cross. All
these exercises are merely bringing up the weeds to the surface, as
ploughing
and harrowing a field. They are useful in this way, and necessary; but
they are
not the crop which faith in the finished work of Christ produces. His
work is
finished. He "appeared once in the end of the world to put away sin by
the
sacrifice of himself;" and He "finished the work which his Father
gave him to do." That work, which puts away our sin, is complete and
accepted of God. If you come to God by Him, if your sins are not all
put away
by it, completely and for ever, they never can be, for He cannot die
again; and
all by the "one sacrifice," or else, as the apostle reasons in
Hebrews 9, "he must often have suffered." I see
this more clearly, and
that it is a perfect, finished work, done once for all. What
do you want, then, still, in order to have peace? Well,
that is what I want to
see clearly. I
am anxious, before we speak of your state and
hindrances, to have the work itself clearly brought before our minds.
Who did
this work? Why,
Christ, of course. What
part had you in completing it? None. None,
surely, unless we say your sins. And to what
state of your soul does it apply —a godly or an ungodly state? Well,
must not I be holy? Surely,
"without holiness no man shall see the
Lord." But do you see how quickly, and with the instinct of
self-righteousness,
you turn from Christ's work to your own holiness —to what you are? It
is
curious-the quicksightedness of man to what makes nothing of him and
his
self-approbation. Your desire of holiness, however, is the desire of
the new
man. Were you indifferent to it, one's work would be to seek to awaken
your
conscience, not to talk of peace: rather, perhaps, to break up false
peace. But
we are now inquiring how an anxious soul can find peace. Quite
so. I am sadly
indifferent sometimes, and that is one thing that troubles me; but I
have not
peace, and I would give anything for it. I
do not doubt such indifference retards, in a certain
sense, your finding it, but we have humbly to learn what we are; the
gain of a
few dollars would give more earnestness to many a soul. But I repeat my
question —Does this work of Christ apply simply to your ungodliness or
godliness, or to an improved state at least? Why,
simply, of course, to my
ungodliness. Undoubtedly.
Consequently not to your holiness, if
there were any, nor to an improved state. Yet, what are you looking for
to get
peace? Is it not an improved state of soul? Why,
yes. Then
you are on the wrong road, for that by which
Christ "has made peace" applies to your ungodliness. Your desire is
right, but you are putting the cart before the horse, as men speak —you
are
looking for holiness to get Christ, instead of looking to have Christ
to get
holiness. But I
do hope for His help in
order to get it. That
I can believe, but you are looking for His help,
not to His work or blood-shedding for peace. You want righteousness not
help.
We need His help every moment when we are justified. He is the Author
of every
good thought in us before. But that is not peace, nor His
blood-shedding, nor
righteousness. Yet this search is not without its fruit for all that,
because
it leads you to see that you cannot thus find what you seek for. You
will
neither find holiness thus, nor peace by it. But, finding that you
cannot and
that when "to will is present" you do not find "how to perform
that which is good," will lead you, through grace, knowing that there
is
no good in you, to that which does give peace —Christ's work— and not
your
state and the work of grace in you. That work God works; but it is not
to lead
us to look at it as the way of peace, but through it and out of
ourselves,
simply and wholly, to Christ's work and His acceptance before God. But
come
now, where are you before God? I do
not know. That is just
what troubles me. Are
you lost? I hope
not. Of course we are
lost by nature; but I hope there is a work of grace in me, though I
sometimes
doubt it. Suppose
you stood before God now, and your case had to
be decided, where would you be, had it, as it must in judgment, to be
decided
by your works? Have you confidence? I hope
it would be right: I
cannot help thinking there is a work of grace in me; but I cannot think
of
judgment without fear. I
trust there is a work of grace in you —do not doubt
it; but here is the turning-point of our inquiry: What you want is, to
be in
God's presence, and know there, if God enters into judgment with you
(as it
must then be in righteousness and in respect of your state and works),
that you
are simply lost! Now you are a sinner, and a sinner cannot subsist
before God
in judgment at all. It is not help you want here; that is, if actually
in God's
presence, but righteousness, and that you have not got; I mean as to
your own
faith and conscience, through and in which we possess it. Righteousness
can
alone suffice before God; and now the righteousness of God, for we have
none,
and only this is to be found. Nor does the work of grace in us produce
this. It
is by faith, through the work of Christ, and in Him we possess it;
through Him
God justifies the ungodly. The
case of the prodigal son will illustrate this.
There was a work of God in him; he came to himself, found himself
perishing,
and set out towards his father. When setting out he acknowledges his
sins,
adding "make me as one of thy hired servants." There was uprightness,
a sense of divine goodness, and a sense of sin, and he was drawing
conclusions
as to what he might hope for when he met his father; and so are you. He
had
what the world of Christians call humility and a humble hope; was
drawing
conclusions just as you are, which proved —what?— that he had never met
his
father. He could not reason as to how he would be received when he did
meet
him, if he had met him. It is the position of one who had never met
God, though
God had wrought in him. When he did meet his father, not a word of
making him
like "the hired servants" is to be found. There was the confession of
sin fully, and his previous experience had brought him in his rags to
his
father, in his sins (not loving them, but in them and confessing them).
The
effect of the previous process was that he then met God, as to his
conscience,
in his sins, and that was all; and had his father on his neck —grace
reigned— and
had the best robe, Christ, the righteousness of God, which no progress
had
given him, of which he had nothing before. It was a new thing conferred
on him. When
in God's presence, we need Christ, not progress;
righteousness and justification through Him, not help or improvement.
God has
helped us, or we should not have been there. There has been progress,
but the
progress has been to bring us into God's presence, not to judge of the
progress
and hope because of it, but to judge of sin in His sight and know He
can have
none of it, and to find Christ our perfect acceptance in His sight
instead of
ourselves —Christ, who has borne our sins— Christ, who is our
righteousness,
perfect, absolute, and eternal. It is not in looking at our progress
that we
find peace. Were it so, we should have to say, "Therefore being
justified
by experience, we have peace with God;" but that the word of God never
says. True progress as to this is our being brought into God's presence
as mere
and wholly lost sinners, confessing our sins, and that "in us, that is,
in
our flesh, there is no good thing;" and thus the consciousness that we
are
lost as a present thing. It
is not a question what we shall be, or how we shall
be judged to be in the day of judgment, but the discovery of what we
are —our
actual sins and our sinful nature— which is the real plague of an
upright soul,
and getting Christ instead of these —"the best robe," instead of our
"rags," when in God's presence in them. We have found Christ and
believed in Him. He has been the propitiation for our sins, bearing
them in His
own body on the tree; and, having Christ, He is our righteousness; God
condemned sin in the flesh, when He was an offering for it (Rom. 8: 3),
and we
are not "in the flesh," but "in Christ." Instead of Adam
and his sins, that is, ourselves, we have Christ and the value of His
work. This
is true of every one that believes in Him, comes
to God by Him. Were we as simple as scripture, it would be seen in a
moment.
But we are not, and we have to be cured of the self-righteousness of
our
hearts, and, as mere sinners before God, find that God in love has
taken up the
question of our sins and our evil nature, has anticipated the day of
judgment,
and settled the question for every one that comes to God by Him, "once
for
all," and for ever, on the cross, has dealt with the sins which I
should
have had to answer for in the day of judgment; and dealt with them in
putting
them away according to His own righteousness, and that there our
fullest form
of sin in flesh against God, that is, enmity against God, met with God
dealing
with sin, in grace to us, but in judgment against it. Sin and God met
on the cross,
when Christ was made sin for us, and by His death we have died to it,
and are
the fruit of the travail of His soul before God. He has borne the sins
of many,
and appeared to put away sin —has glorified God about it in
righteousness in
that momentous hour. He took what I had earned; I get the fruit of what
He has
done. Practically
speaking, I come to God like Abel, with
that sacrifice in my hand; God must own its value; I have the testimony
that I
am righteous: the witness is borne to my gifts; my acceptance is
according to
the value of Christ's sacrifice in God's sight; coming with that is
confession
of righteous exclusion in myself, not of improvement in state; I come
with
Christ in my hand, so to speak, my slain Lamb, and the testimony is to
my gift.
God looks at that when I thus come by it, not at my state, which, so
coming, is
confessedly that of a sinner, and only a sinner, as to his own title,
shut out
from God. But
must I not accept Christ? Ah,
how "I" gets through the blessedest
testimonies of God's ways towards us in grace. I say, here is Christ on
God's
part for you —God's Lamb. You answer —"But must not I?" I am not
surprised. It is no reproach I make; it is human nature, my nature in
the
flesh; but know that in "I" there is no good thing. But tell me,
would you not be glad to have Him? Surely
I should. Then
your real question is, not about accepting Him,
but whether God has really presented Him to you, and eternal life in
Him. A
simple soul would say, "Accept! I am only too thankful to have Him!"
but as all are not simple, one word on this also. If you have offended
some one
grievously, and a friend seeks to offer him satisfaction, who is to
accept it? Why,
the offended person, of
course. Surely.
And who was offended by your sins? Why,
God, of course. And
who must accept the satisfaction? Why,
God must. That
is it. Do you believe He has accepted it? Undoubtedly
I do. And
is— Satisfied. And
are not you? Oh! I
see it now. Christ has
done the whole work, and God has accepted it, and there can be no more
question
as to my guilt or righteousness. He is the latter for me before God. It
is
wonderful! and yet so simple! But why did I not see it? how very stupid! That
is faith in Christ's work, not our accepting it,
gladly as we do, not believing God has. You have no need to enquire now
whether
you believe. The object is before your soul, seen by it: what God has
revealed
is known in seeing it thus by faith. You are assured of that, not of
your own
state. As you see the lamp before you and know it, not by knowing the
state of
your eye; you know the state of your eye by seeing it. But you say, How
stupid
I was. It is ever so. But allow me to ask you what you were looking
for? —Christ,
or holiness in yourself and a better state of soul? Well,
holiness and a better
state of soul. No
wonder you did not see Christ then. Now this is
what God calls submitting to God's righteousness, finding a
righteousness which
is neither of nor in ourselves, but finding Christ before God, and the
proud
will, through grace, submitting to be saved by that which is not of or
in
ourselves. It is Christ instead of self, instead of our place in the
flesh. Had
you obtained peace in the way you sought it, you would have been
satisfied with
whom? Myself. Just
so. And what would that have been? Nothing real
indeed, and shutting out Christ if it were, save as a help; shutting
Him out as
righteousness and peace. And as an upright soul taught really of God
cannot be
satisfied with itself, it remains, though confidingly in love if
walking with God,
yet without peace for years perhaps, till it does submit to God's
righteousness. And now note another point: for the soul at peace with
God can
now contemplate Christ to learn. He has not only borne our sins, and
died to
sin, and closed the whole history of the old man in death for those who
believe, they having been crucified with Him; but He has glorified God
in this
work (John 12: 31, 33; 17: 4, 5), and so obtained a place for man in
the glory
of God, and a place of present positive acceptance, according to the
nature and
favour of God whom He has glorified; and that is our place before God.
It is
not only that the old man and his sins are all put out of God's sight,
but we
are in Christ before God; and this we have the consciousness of by the
Holy Ghost
given to us (John 14: 20), accepted in the Beloved, divine favour
resting on us
as on Him. And thus too He dwells in us; and this leads unto true
practical
holiness. We are sanctified, set apart, to God by His blood; but we are
so in
possessing His life, or Him as our life, and the Holy Ghost; and these,
or, if
you please, He Himself becomes the measure of our walk and relationship
with
God. We are not our own, but bought with a price, and nothing
inconsistent with
His blood, and the price of it, and its power in our hearts, becomes a
Christian. This
was beautifully expressed in the Old Testament in
figures. When a leper was cleansed, besides the sacrifice, the blood
was put on
the tips of his ear, his thumb, and his great toe. Every thought, every
act,
all in our walk which cannot pass the test of that blood, is excluded
from the
Christian's thoughts and walk. And how glad he is to be freed from this
world
and the body of sin practically, and have that precious blood as the
motive,
measure, and security for it; that whatever grieves the Holy Spirit of
God, by
which we are sealed when thus sprinkled, is unsuited to a Christian,
seeing he
dwells in Him. And that precious blood and the love Christ shewed in
shedding
it become the motive, and the Holy Ghost the power of, devotedness and
love in
walking as Christ walked. If we are in Christ, Christ is in us; and we
know it
by the Comforter given (John 14); and we are the epistle of Christ in
this
world: the life of Jesus is to be manifested in our mortal body. But
your standard is very
high. It
is simply what scripture gives. "He that saith
he abideth in him ought to . . . walk even as he walked." God Himself
is
set before us as the model, Christ being the expression of what is
divine in a
man. "Be ye followers of God as dear children, and walk in love, as
Christ
has loved us and given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to
God for a
sweet smelling savour." Nor is there any limit. "Hereby know we love,
because he laid down his life for us, and we ought to lay down our
lives for
the brethren." "Now are ye light in the Lord, walk as children of
light." But you may remark here that there is nothing legal, nothing by
which we are seeking to make our case good with God. Many would say
that complete
grace and assurance leaves liberty to do as we like; that, if we are
completely
saved, what are the motives or need of any works? It is a dreadful
principle.
As if we have no motive but "getting saved" to work by, none but
legal bondage and obligations; and if we are saved, all motive is gone.
Have
the angels no motive? It is an utter blundering mistake, such as we
could not
make in human things. What should we think of the sense of one who told
us,
that a man's children were exempt from obligation because they were
certainly
and always his children? I should say that they were always and
certainly under
obligation, because they were always and certainly his children, and
that if
they were not, the obligation ceased. That is
clear enough, though
I never thought of it. But you do not mean to say that we were under no
obligation before we were children of God? I
do not, but we were not under that obligation. You
cannot be under the obligation of living as a Christian till you are
one. We
were under the obligation of living as men ought to live, as men in the
flesh
before God; and of that the law was the perfect measure. But upon that
ground
we were wholly lost, as we have seen. Now we are completely saved, who
through
grace believe, and are all the children of God by faith in Christ
Jesus. And
our duties are the duties of God's children. Duties always flow, and
right
affections too, from the relationships we are in, and the consciousness
of the
relationship is the spring and character of the duty; though our
forgetting it does
not alter the obligation. And so scripture always speaks, "Be ye
followers
of God as dear children." "Put on therefore, as the elect of God,
holy and beloved, bowels of mercy." Right affections and duties flow
from
the place we are already in, and are never the means of getting into
it. We
enjoy it when we walk in it; rather we enjoy the light and favour of
God,
communion with Him in it. But, note, failure in faithfulness does not
lead to
doubt the relationship, but, because we are in it, to blame ourselves
for
inconsistency with it. Here the advocacy of Christ comes in and other
truths,
which I cannot enter into now, though most precious in their place.
Only remark
that that advocacy is not the means of our obtaining righteousness, but
is
founded on it and Christ's having made the propitiation for our sins.
Nor do we
go to Him that He may advocate, but He goes for us because we have
sinned.
Christ had prayed for Peter before he had even committed the sin, and
just for
what was needed; not that he might not be sifted; he wanted that; but
that his
faith might not fail when he was sifted. Ah, if we knew how to trust
Him! See
how, in the midst of His enemies, He looked at Peter at the very right
moment
to break his heart! How
simple things are when we
take the word; and how it changes all your thoughts of God. One is
altogether
in a new state! True
indeed, and this leads to two other points I
wished to advert to. We have looked at Christ's work as satisfying,
yea,
glorifying God, because we had to see how righteousness was to be had.
But we
must remember it was God's sovereign love which gave Christ, and the
same love
in which He offered Himself for us. It is not for us righteousness
reigns; that
will indeed be true hereafter, when judgment returns to righteousness,
when God
will come and judge the earth. But for us grace reigns, sovereign
goodness, God
Himself, through righteousness, a divine righteousness, as we have
seen, which
gives us a place in glory in God's presence according to the acceptance
of
Christ, and like Him. It is sovereign grace which gives a sinner a
place with
the Son of God, conformed to His image. Yet it is righteous; for His
blood and
work fully and necessarily claim such a place, as we have seen in John
13 and
17. And now "we joy in God himself through our Lord Jesus Christ." We
know Him as love (and this love as the sum of all our joy and
blessing), yet in
righteousness in Christ, for we are made the righteousness of God in
Him. We
know God in love, and are reconciled to Him. It is a blessed place, a
place of
holy affections and peaceful rest. We have communion with the Father
and with
His Son Jesus Christ. What is communion? Why,
common thoughts and joys
and feelings. Think
of that —with the Father and with His Son Jesus
Christ! That is
wonderful. I hardly
get into that. Well,
we have to seek that Christ may dwell in our
hearts by faith, being rooted and grounded in love, that we may
comprehend. Yet
if the Holy Ghost who dwells in us is the source of our thoughts and
joys and
feelings, they cannot be discordant, though we may be poor feeble
creatures,
with those of the Father and the Son. Does not the Christian's heart
delight in
Christ, in His words, His obedience, His holiness, His sacrifice of
Himself to
the Father's will? and does not the Father delight in it? we indeed
most poorly
and feebly, He infinitely; but the object is one. He is chosen of God
and
precious, and to them that believe He is precious. I go no farther than
to cite
this as an illustration. This is a matter of your daily life and
diligence of
heart; but you can understand that what comes from the Holy Ghost must
conform
to the mind of the Father and the Son. That is
evident, but it is so
new to me; I am brought into such a different world! If this be true,
where are
we all? I
leave you to ponder over this, and to search the
word whether these things are so; whether scripture, which fully
recognizes our
passing through exercises of soul as coming to it, ever looks at the
Christian
otherwise than as forgiven, and accepted in the Beloved, and knowing it
as one
who has "not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but the
Spirit
of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father." But if
I receive this, there
is a passage which I don't understand. We are told to "examine
ourselves whether
we are in the faith," and what you have said, it seems to me, sets this
aside. We
are told no such thing. Many a sincere soul is
honestly doing it, and we all pass naturally through it. But it
is there in scripture. The
words are part of a sentence in 2 Corinthians 13:
3, 5. But the beginning of the sentence is this: "Since ye seek a proof
of
Christ speaking in me," . . . then a parenthesis . . . "examine
yourselves, whether ye be in the faith." It is a taunt. The Corinthians
had
called in question Christ's speaking in Paul, and the reality of his
apostleship, as you may see all through both epistles. And he says, as
a final
argument, "You had better examine yourselves; how came you to be
Christians?" for he had been the means of their conversion. Hence he
adds,
"Know ye not your own selves that Christ dwells in you, except ye be
reprobates?" How came He there? He appeals to their certainty to prove
his
apostleship to their shame: but this is no direction to examine whether
one is
in the faith. It is all well to examine whether we are walking up to
it; but
that is a very different thing. A child does right to do that as to his
conduct
as such; it would be sad work for him to do the other and examine if he
were a
child. The consciousness, and the never failing consciousness of a
relationship, is a different thing from consistency with it; and we
must not
confound the two. The loss of the consciousness of the relationship
(which,
however, I do not think takes place when once really possessed, unless
in cases
of divine discipline for sins) destroys the grounds of duty and the
possibility
of affections according to it. Look at the passage. I see
it plain enough. There
is nothing to complete the passage, "Since ye seek a proof of Christ
speaking in me," if we do not connect this with it. And, in any case,
the
force of the apostle's reasoning is clear, and he appeals to their
certainty —"Know
ye not?" This last would have no sense, if they were to examine as a
duty
if it was so. But where had we got to with scripture? Rather,
where had we got to without it? You don't read
and search as you ought. Do so, and the truth will be clear to you:
only,
surely, we need God's grace and looking to Him, that we may receive the
"sincere milk of the word as new born babes." I
have yet one point I wish very briefly to notice, to
dear up our minds on the subject we are enquiring into. In receiving
Christ we
receive life. "This is the record," says John, "that God hath
given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the
Son
hath life." Between this life and the flesh there is no common thought.
If
we do not realize redemption, our being quickened (not taking us from
under the
law and the sense of our own responsibility) puts us in misery of heart
at
finding sin in us, as in Romans 7. If we do know redemption, and have
been
sealed by the Spirit, still "the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and
the
Spirit against the flesh;" they are contrary as ever one to the other.
But
if led of the Spirit, we are not under the law. Now you have been
trying to
draw hopeful conclusions from finding signs of life in yourself; having
only a
general apprehension, which always accompanies true conversion, of the
goodness
of God, strengthened by the knowledge that Christ died. But all this
reasoning
about yourself was in no way faith in redemption. It left you still,
though
with better hope, in view of judgment; or, at least, if when looking at
the
cross you saw that there was there what you needed as a sinner, you
still
looked for something better in yourself, you could not say you
possessed what
you needed in the cross —yea, were the fruit of it, as to your state
before
God; and when you turned to the judgment, your state would stand you in
no good
stead there. Life is not redemption. Both belong to the believer, but
they are
different things. You were looking for proofs of life, concluding that,
if they
were there, you could pass in the judgment; and then perhaps in a vague
way you
brought in Christ to boot! I think
you have described my
case pretty nearly. Now
when persons live close with God in simplicity of
heart, the sense of goodness in God predominates, and there is the
savour of
piety; but when they do not, there is uneasiness and restlessness; the
accusing
conscience predominates, and they are unhappy, if not dismally afraid.
But in
neither case is redemption really known; it is not known that Christ
has taken
our place in judgment, and given us His in glory: only we must wait for
the
adoption itself, the redemption of the body. The way in which scripture
unites
these two truths is in the resurrection of Christ. This is the power of
life,
and the seal of the acceptance of His work —His coming fully up out of
the
consequences of our sin into another state. So we in Him. We were dead
in sin,
exposed to judgment, and under death; Christ comes down from heaven,
accomplishing in dying the work of putting our sins away; and we are
dead with
Him; and then He and we with Him are raised, consequent on the
completed work,
and God's acceptance of it. He has quickened us together with Him,
having
forgiven us all trespasses. It is life, whose full divine power is
shewn in
resurrection; it is not only eternal life communicated, but deliverance
out of
the state we were in, and our entrance into another; not outwardly of
course
yet, but really by the possession of this life. Redemption means,
though by
price, a deliverance out of the state I was in, and bringing me into
another
and a free one. Hence we talk of the redemption of the body, which we
have not
yet. Life does not by itself give this: through it we feel the burden
of the
old state we are in; but when we find that we are redeemed also, we
know that
we have been brought, at the cost of Christ's death, out of the old
Adam state
we were in, into Christ. Hence we have "boldness in the day of
judgment;
because as he is, so are we in this world." I
cannot follow quite the
course of scripture thoughts you give. I must learn these things; but I
see the
difference between redemption and life, though we have both in Christ
now. He
has died and is risen. I suppose I had life before; but I have, in a
measure,
now understood redemption too. Yes,
you were of course redeemed. And surely God had
wrought in you in grace, as you said; but, as already said, you were
looking at
this in view of a God of judgment, with glimpses of divine love, but
had not
faith in accomplished redemption. See how the reasoning of the apostle
applies
to this in Romans 5: 19: "By one man's obedience many shall be made
(constituted) righteous." "Then," says the flesh, "I may
live in sin." What is the answer? No, you ought not! This would be to
put
you back under the claims of law, and so destroy again what is taught
of
Christ's obedience. In no wise: "How can we that are dead to sin live
in
it?" You have been baptized to Christ's death, and are a Christian by
having part in His death. How, if you have died with Him to sin, can
you live
in it? We are now free to give ourselves to God, as those that are
alive from
the dead. Well,
while the old
foundations remain, it makes a new thing of the whole matter. It is not
the
same way of putting Christianity at all. I have to realize it, though I
am
quite different as to my ground of peace already; or, rather, I have
one, and
had not before. But I see it is in scripture, and I must search that
out. The
truth is, the great body of true sincere
Christians are as those without, hoping it will be all right when they
get in;
instead of being within and shewing what is there to the world, as the
epistle
of Christ. But you
would make us all out-and-out
Christians, dead, as you say, to the world and everything. Surely.
"A double-minded man is unstable in all
his ways." It is the single eye which causes the whole body to be full
of
light. We are not our own. The new man cannot have his objects here;
his
service he has: so had Christ; in nothing did He have His objects. We
are
crucified to the world, and the world to us; and so we have crucified
the flesh
with its affections and lusts. Only remember, that the flesh lusts
against the
Spirit, and that this needs vigilance, "working out," as to the
passage of the wilderness, "your salvation with fear and trembling:"
not because your place is uncertain, but because God does "work in you
to
will and to do:" and it is a serious thing to maintain God's cause when
the flesh is in us, and Satan disposes of the world to hinder and
deceive us.
But do not be discouraged, for God works in you; greater is He that is
in us
than he that is in the world. You cannot be in wilderness difficulties
unless
you have been redeemed out of It is
true. Do not suppose I
want to make difficulties: but there is still a question I have to ask;
I wish
to get clear on these points. We have been taught to rely on God's
promises and
trust them for our salvation; it is the language we constantly hear,
and I do
not see, if your view be right, how exactly to connect it with trusting
in the
promises for salvation; and surely we should do that. The
answer is very simple, and I am glad you put the
question. It is just these points we have to inquire into. Trusting
God's
promises is clearly right: that is certain; and there are most precious
promises too. But tell me, is it a promise that Christ shall come and
die and
rise again? No: He
is come, and has died,
and is risen, and is at God's right hand. This
then cannot be a promise, because it is an
accomplished fact. For Abraham it was a promise, and he did right to
believe it
as such. To us it is an accomplished fact, and we must believe it as
such. And
so scripture speaks. He believed that that which God had promised He
was able
also to perform. But we believe that what by its efficacy saves us He
has
performed. It would be unbelief to treat it yet as a promise; and so it
is
written —"You to whom it shall be imputed, believing on him who hath
raised up Jesus Christ from the dead." You will find both passages
together, speaking of this very point, at the end of Romans 4. As to
help on
our journey onward, there are many and cherished promises. "I will
never
leave thee nor forsake thee." "God will not suffer us to be tempted
above that we are able to bear." "No man shall pluck his sheep out of
his hand." "Who will also confirm you to the end, that ye may be
blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ." I might cite many
others
of the greatest comfort and value to us in our difficulties on the way.
But the
work in which I have to believe as justifying me and reconciling me to
God, as
alone and perfectly putting away my sins and redeeming me to God, is
not a
promise; nor can it be looked at as such. It is an accomplished fact, a
work
already accepted of God. I see
it clearly; indeed,
nothing can be simpler and plainer the moment it is before you. What
justifies
before God is not a promise at all, but an accomplished fact. I had
never
noticed that passage in Romans 4. It is very plain. How carelessly one
reads
scripture. But indeed, the truth of what you say is evident on the face
of it. Allow
me, as we have touched this point, to draw your
attention to another thing in the form in which the work and testimony
of grace
is put. You may remark that in the passage in Romans 4 it is said, not
"believe on Christ," however true that remains, but "on him that
raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead." So Peter, "who by him do
believe in God who raised him up from the dead and gave him glory." So
the
Lord Himself as to His coming into the world, "He that heareth my
words,
and believeth on him that sent me." We know God Himself only really, by
knowing Him through Christ. If I know Him thus, I know Him as God our
Saviour;
as one who has not spared His Son for me: as one who, when Christ was
dead as
having taken our sins, raised Him from the dead. In a word, I not only
believe
in Christ, but in Him who has given Christ and owned His work; who has
given
glory to man in Him; as a God who has come to save, not as one who is
waiting
to judge me. I believe in Him by Christ. When You
make a Christian a
wonderful person in the world; but we are very weak for such a place. I
could never make him in my words what God has made
him in His. As to weakness, the more we feel it, the better. Christ's
strength
is made perfect in our weakness. © SEDIN 2004
To the Main Page
You can write to us at: SEDIN Apartat 126 17244 Cassà de la Selva (Girona) SPAIN |
Index: Homepage |